A research office or IQAC team preparing an accreditation submission needs more than a publication count — they need to be able to defend it. ScholarBook exists to turn an institution's scattered research record into one place where every figure traces back to a specific, open registry entry.
Not a static report generator — a working platform. The same verified publication and faculty record powers your accreditation reports, a self-service portal for your own departments, and a public profile you can point an evaluator to.
A faculty member submits their own paper — by DOI, or by hand if it doesn't have one yet — never a website scrape, never a guess.
Each author is matched against their own ORCID record, and each DOI is checked against the paper's own publisher-submitted metadata at PubMed or CrossRef.
Every faculty-submitted paper and profile claim sits in a review queue — nothing becomes official output until your own admin confirms it.
The same confirmed record becomes a submission-ready volume, a portal your departments run day to day, and a page you can share with evaluators.
Every source is an authorized, open channel — never a fetch of a publisher's or institution's own website.
A submitted publication is a candidate, not a fact, until a real reviewer accepts it.
A paper a faculty member typed in by hand is marked as such, never presented as if it came from an open registry.
Your roster, your candidates, your reports. Enforced at every layer, not just hidden in the interface.
The people who have to generate and defend the institution's official submission-ready research record.
Each department runs its own roster, roles and courses, and faculty can add their own research directly — reviewed before it counts.
Anyone reading the institution's public research profile or a generated report, wanting to trust the numbers without re-verifying every one.
Write in and we'll walk you through what a report, portal or public profile would look like for your own faculty data.