Your faculty submit their own work by name, but that alone isn't enough — ScholarBook checks it against ORCID, PubMed and CrossRef, and your research office reviews it, before it becomes official institutional output.
A faculty member added it, or a department admin added it on their behalf. Not yet reviewed.
Checked against ORCID/PubMed/CrossRef where a DOI exists. Waiting on your office's review.
Confirmed by evidence and your reviewer. Counts in your report.
Contradicted by an independent source, or flagged by your team.
The author's own public ORCID record lists this exact work — their own statement, not a name-similarity guess.
The paper's own publisher-submitted affiliation record names your institution — checked against the registry directly, never a re-fetch of the publisher's site.
When the registries are silent or conflicting, a person on your team decides — and that decision, with its reasoning, becomes part of the record.
A paper a faculty member typed in by hand (no DOI to verify against) is marked as self-reported — never presented as if it came from an open registry.
Or leave your details and we'll show you what this looks like on your own institution's data.