Your faculty add their own published work through their own portal. Nothing counts as official institutional output until your research office reviews it and ScholarBook cross-checks it against CrossRef, PubMed and ORCID — with the evidence trail to back every line. No spreadsheets stitched together by hand, no publication count nobody can defend under questioning.
No scraping, no auto-added records — every publication is submitted by name and reviewed before it counts.
Nothing here is a stock photo of a server room — this is literally the shape of the pipeline: your faculty submit a paper, your research office reviews it, open registries confirm what they can, and only then does it become your report, portal and public profile.
Every accepted publication carries its supporting evidence — ORCID match, PubMed/CrossRef confirmation, or a reviewer's note — so any claim can be defended on request.
Your roster, your candidates, your reports. No institution can see another's data, enforced at every layer, not just the UI.
Faculty are matched to their own ORCID record, not guessed from a name. Unclear matches stay unverified until your office confirms them.
Publications by year, by department, drillable — so you can answer "what did Biochemistry publish in 2024" in one click.
Generate an annual research volume with full abstracts wherever the license permits, formatted for accreditation submission.
Every verification checks an open, authorized registry — ORCID, ROR, PubMed, CrossRef. No institution website is ever crawled.
Sign in to add your first submission, or write in and we'll set up a walkthrough with your own faculty.